Prime Services

Sina Toussi on Finding Alpha Where Other Investors Fear to Tread


3 min read
Sina Toussi on Finding Alpha Where Other Investors Fear to Tread

Most hedge fund managers treat legal risk as something to be avoided. Sina Toussi has built a fund around the premise that it is something to be priced.

Toussi, Founder and Chief Investment Officer of Two Seas Capital, sat down with Leor Shapiro, Global Head of Capital Introductions at Jefferies, at the firm’s Global Capital Introductions flagship conference in New York. The conversation covered a strategy that since the fund’s launch five years ago, a track record built almost entirely on opportunities that most other investors either cannot analyze or choose not to pursue.

Two Seas focuses on public equities, bonds, bank debt, and selective litigation financing, all connected by a single thread: legal and regulatory catalysts that the market is either underpricing or mispricing.

The Investment Strategy

Toussi’s background is unusual for a portfolio manager. He trained as an attorney at Skadden Arps before joining his first hedge fund in 2006, where he developed an early instinct for the value that legal outcomes could unlock in distressed and emerging market situations. The conviction that this approach could be applied far more broadly across public markets became the founding thesis of Two Seas in 2021.

In the clip below, Toussi walks through the mechanics of how Two Seas sources and sizes its investments, explaining why fundamental analysis comes first, how the fund isolates the value of a legal claim relative to the underlying business, and why proximity to a legal catalyst is as important as the probability of winning it.

The Hedging Strategy

Running a broad portfolio of names, each sized based on upside, downside, probability, and proximity, is only one part of what makes Two Seas difficult to replicate. Another is how the fund thinks about hedging, which follows a logic that is as specific to each situation as the investment thesis itself.

From a mRNA patent dispute, to Argentine GDP warrants, and a nuclear energy regulatory battle, the hedging strategy could range from shorting a counterparty to a legal claim, to taking a position in sovereign debt, to identifying a competitor facing the same regulatory headwinds that its portfolio company has already navigated. Each case illustrates a different dimension of how Two Seas might choose to manage the asymmetry between what it can win and what it can lose.

The Conditions Shaping the Opportunity Set

Two Seas launched with an expectation of doing significantly more distressed investing than the market ultimately provided. What Toussi found instead was a deepening pipeline of opportunities in public equities, particularly in biotech, where the combination of scientific complexity and legal uncertainty causes many investors to step back entirely.

The current political environment has added another dimension. Toussi also discussed how each new administration’s regulatory posture can generate a new category of opportunity for a fund built to analyse exactly this kind of legal and political volatility.

A Moat Built on What Others Cannot Do

Two Seas occupies a position in the market that Toussi believes will only become more defensible over time. The fund’s proprietary networks of legal advisors, its databases for sourcing and pricing litigation risk, and its ability to reach an investment decision the same day an opportunity is presented have helped establish relationships with law firms, other hedge funds, and legal advisers seeking to assess legal risk quickly.

On the question of whether AI will eventually erode that edge, Toussi is sanguine. Reading a courtroom, assessing a judge’s disposition, and understanding the compounding dynamics of a legal process remain, in his view, among the last areas of investing where human judgment retains a durable advantage over algorithmic analysis. The moat, he argues, is widening rather than narrowing: the systems, proprietary networks, and accumulated pattern recognition that Two Seas has built over five years would take a new entrant a very long time to replicate, and the market is only generating more of the kind of complexity the fund was built to navigate.